Poka Laenui: “Our charge is very specific, i.e. to propose a Native Hawaiian government.”
Aloha Kakou:
I find it interesting that Kale Gumapac measures the success of the Aha Kanaka Ku`oko`a from the standard of the participants’ agreement to unify the proponents of sovereignty under one entity. I’m puzzled by how he divined such a standard. From the invitation I received by Manu Kaiama, it was a call to share our various positions with one another. I had not known of Kale’s agenda. I wonder if the other participants were just as unaware as I?
I have assessed the gathering as a smashing success. Indeed, whenever we are able to gather together under one roof, share food, exchange information, and remain unified in spirit to our devotion to Hawaiian Independence, whether it is at a march protesting the fraud of Statehood, or at a rally rededicating our efforts to bringing about true sovereignty, I believe such a gathering is a success. In this case, Ms. Kaiama and her organizers were especially successful by not getting in the way, but making sure that the way was open for good communication.
With regards to the position of the Aha Hawaii Oiwi (Native Hawaiian Convention), had I known that the expectation was that we look to unifying under one single proponent of sovereignty, I would not have attended. The process we (AHO) undertook to form, was through the elective voice of over 30,000 voters of Hawaiian ancestry from throughout the world who addressed the question, “Shall the Hawaiian people elect delegates to propose a Native Hawaiian government?” This occurred in July 1996. Approximately 75% of those who voted said “Yes.” As a result, we moved to the next process of electing delegates from throughout Hawaii and America, each delegate representing a particular geographic region from which they reside. I have been elected from my community of Lualualei Valley in the moku of Wai`anae. Almost 90 others have been elected to this convention, to represent their particular home district.
Our charge is very specific, i.e. to propose a Native Hawaiian government. It is not to form coalitions, it is not to negotiate the Akaka bill, it is not to elect kings or queens, or adopt one or another constitution as the government of independent Hawaii. After we have proposed a Native Hawaiian government to our constituents, i.e., the native Hawaiian people, what they choose to do with the proposal rest in their hands.
As chairperson of the convention, I have no authority or mandate to unify our effort under someone’s declaration of themselves as the Head of State, King, Queen, Regent, or Alii Nui of Hawaii. Indeed, one of the reasons for the decision to follow this elective process of selecting representatives to meet in a convention, was to step away from the many proclamations being made of one or another person’s claim to being Hawaii’s head of state. If there was a truly genuine effort to unify the Hawaiian people, this is that effort, i.e. letting the Hawaiian people select their representatives to sit with all representatives in a convention.
Out of this gathering of elected representatives, many of whom had come from such self-proclaimed Hawaiian governments, many from civic clubs, homestead associations, and independent individuals, we have met and are close to a proposal of a form of government. I hope to be able to call our delegates together when the time is ripe, for the finalization of that document to be presented to the Hawaiian people.
I have provided copies of our draft Constitution for the Nation of Hawaii to the assembly on Saturday. I would be happy to share this document with any of you who have not had the opportunity to obtain such a copy. You may contact me at my email address with the subject: “AHO draft Constitution requested”
Mr. Gumapac’s reference to my position on the Akaka bill should also be addressed. My thoughts on the Akaka Bill is my own. The AHO has taken no position on that Bill and I would object to any attempt to take such a position. Our mandate is clear, i.e. to propose a Native Hawaiian government. That having been said, I do not think any further discussion on my position on the Akaka Bill would be relevant in this venue.
Mahalo for your providing me an opportunity to respond.
Aloha a hui hou.
Poka Laenui
plaenui@hawaiianperspectives.org




